[at-l] Earl Shaffer's hike

Felix J AThiker at smithville.net
Mon Jul 4 18:32:44 CDT 2011

On 7/4/2011 12:20 PM, Jim Bullard wrote:
> And the anal retentive crowd will have one more thing to 
> feel self-righteous about.
> I for one have never believed it was about honoring a 
> bunch of paint marks on trees, rather it was "/To see. And 
> to see what you see/". The trail is a path /through /the 
> woods along the Appalachian Mountain chain. It isn't about 
> itself. It's about the the woods and the mountains that it 
> traverses. Hiking it is a ritual or pilgrimage, not unlike 
> the rituals of religion, meant to lead the participant to 
> a larger, transcendent experience. The path or ritual 
> takes you to the emotional and spiritual space where you 
> can be open to and experience that transcendence, but if 
> you get trapped in the physical ritual, you will miss the 
> transcendence.

I went to hike the whole trail. and, that's what I did.   
And, I had a helluva time doing it.  Anybody who says I 
didn't enjoy my hike to the fullest extent because I was a 
purist is, quite simply, full of shit.  And, anybody who 
fails a thru-hike and says it is because it 'was about the 
journey and not the destination' is full of shit.  Doesn't 
mean they didn't have a helluva time. It doesn't mean they 
didn't see what they saw. It means they failed a thru-hike. 
What is so hard to understand about that?  I'm not sure 
about rituals and pilgrimages....my hike was neither. I went 
to hike the whole trail. and, that's what I did.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://patsy.hack.net/pipermail/at-l/attachments/20110704/0ef081bc/attachment.html 

More information about the at-l mailing list