[at-l] at-l versus Whiteblases

greyowl at rcn.com greyowl at rcn.com
Wed Feb 28 13:10:04 CST 2007


Did not accuse you of promoting Whiteblazes.  Sorry for the confusion.  It one of those days, everything I try to do ends up wrong.  Excuse me as I crawl into my hole.

Bob


---- Original message ----
>Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 14:00:55 -0500
>From: "Ken Bennett" <bennettk at wfu.edu>  
>Subject: Re: [at-l] at-l versus Whiteblases  
>To: "greyowl at rcn.com" <greyowl at rcn.com>
>Cc: at-l at backcountry.net
>
>   On 2/28/07, greyowl at rcn.com <greyowl at rcn.com> wrote:
>
>     I really find it difficult to follow what is going
>     on at whiteblases, it is really nothing more than
>     a bulletin board and those are so old
>     fashion.  Yes this list had a hell of a lot more
>     traffic and a number of people use to go to
>     digest.  I actually like the free-wheeling style
>     of this mail list, though there are times I am
>     sure Ryan is ready to pull his hair out.
>
>     Another reason that I don't really like
>     whiteblases is because of the thru hikers.  Many
>     of them rub me the wrong way.  For the most part
>     the more laid back thru hikers hank out here and
>     they are around, they just don't post.
>
>   Hey, now, I wasn't trying to promote Whiteblaze. I
>   didn't provide a link, or anything. I was just
>   answering the question.
>
>   --Ken



More information about the at-l mailing list